Modern techniques and methods of management Term Paper

Modern techniques and methods of management - Term idea ExampleMark uses an automobile washboard to bring out the point that the system should be satisfactory to predict the result of the score prior to the daily keeping of records. According to the article, the clarity and dynamic consanguinity is clearly illustrated between the process measures and result measures. Pertinently, it is not only important to identify the process of the net score but also the final score in its exact outcome at the lay off of the process. The measured process is vital in the evaluation of the whole process and procedures in an organization, which is pertinent since single, is able-bodied to change the direction of the process to suit his or her expectations. In conclusion, Mark Henderson rates the accuracy of the dashboard as follows (Doshi, 2008.p.123). He says, the dashboards are not accurate machines to prompt the user on the specific problem. sort of it gives directions or assumptions on w hat might be wrong. On the other hand, Gary Lockwood directs his arguments still on the dashboard as the measurement of effective management. Therefore, the article argues that the dashboard is the best system in the measurement of the organizational profit. ... He adds that, with its consistence use, the dashboard shows the weakness of the organizations operation (Drucker, & Maciariello, 2008.p. 321). In summary, Gary Lockwood recommends the above phenomena to the entrepreneurs in that, he urges them to use dashboard consistently in order to coerce their business directly. According to Jim Clemmer, he affirms that before long there are too m both measures formulated to solve the internal needs of an organization. In one room or another, the above measures can be used to serve satisfactorily the managements control and command paranoia. Notable is the fact that many measures are used to gauge several departments including the homophile resource as well as other supportive departm ents. Despite the fact that many managers verify on the measurement of finance in an organization, as the basic indicator of the health of an organization, it is advisable to stupid on history, which is the bottom line for a healthy organization. Here, history means the todays consequences, results from yesterdays decision of management (Epstein, 2004.p.201). He argues that what is expected to be measured is the usefulness of the information and not data, as argued by Mark and Gary above. In summary Jim puts it that, regular measurement does not in any way change the situation, in addition, he takes his own example and demonstrates that when he weighs himself ten times daily, that exclusively wont change his current weight. Therefore, the measurement is only indicators of what is happening but not a way of evading the reality. Moreover, with correct data, one is capable to further improve and transform of the organization effectively. Therefore, it is advisable to first get the right tool, then