Presented to the Australian Physiotherapy Association, October 1, 2009, Sydney, Australia.
-------------------------------------------------
cover of Form
Andrew M. Leaver, PhDa, Christopher G. Maher, PhDb, Robert D. Herbert, PhDb, Jane Latimer, PhDb, James H. McAuley, PhDc, Gwendolen Jull, PhDd, Kathryn M. Refshauge, PhDa
Bottom of Form
AbstractÂ
Leaver AM, Maher CG, Herbert RD, Latimer J, McAuley JH, Jull G, Refshauge KM. A randomised controlled trial comparing manipulation with mobilization for recent invasion know torture.
Objective
To determine whether neck manipulation is more efficacious for neck pain than mobilization.
Design
Randomized controlled trial with blind sagaciousness of outcome.
Setting
Primary care physiotherapy, chiropractic, and osteopathy clinics in Sydney, Australia.
Participants
Patients (N=182) with nonspecific neck pain less than 3 months in duproportionn and deemed suitable for word with manipulation by the treating practitioner.
Interventions
Participants were randomly assigned to receive word with neck manipulation (n=91) or mobilization (n=91). Patients in some(prenominal) groups received 4 treatments over 2 weeks.
Main conclusion Measure
The number of days taken to recover from the episode of neck pain.
Results
The median number of days to recovery of pain was 47 in the manipulation group and 43 in the mobilization group. Participants treated with neck manipulation did not experience more rapid recovery than those treated with neck mobilization (hazard ratio=.98; 95% confidence interval, .661.46).
Conclusions
Neck manipulation is not appreciably more effective than mobilization. The use of neck manipulation because cannot be justified on the basis of superior effectiveness.
mark Words:Â Chiropractic, Manipulation, spinal, Neck pain, RehabilitationIf you want to get a skilful essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment