As critic congratulate Roy McGregor puts it, "Camus brings together in this single story 'the three characters of the [absurd] drama': 'the superstitious ['this vast land' that denies man], human race nostalgia [the desire to understand and belong] and the absurd [absolute meaninglessness] that springs from their encounter' (307). It is senseless for the lymph node to consider prison over freedom, yet he does this. Nihilists might use the guest's decision to support their contention that bread and aloneter is pointless and that it does not matter which way the guest decides to go, exclusively Camus clearly does not believe that. Daru is deeply troubled by the guest's decision to go toward prison, and this evidences a belief that life is expense living and that imprisonment equates to a theft of worthwhile days of life. Marxism, too, could justify itself in the guest's decision, arguing that the decision could be criticized on many levels, both from the guest's point of view, Daru's, and society's, but Camus is not criticizing anyone. human being nostalgia and the desire to understand and belong permeate the story, although Camus provides no dissolving agent to them. The absurd is palpable in the story, as well. It is absurd to choose prison over freedom and life, yet the prisoner does this. McGregor points step up that Camus, "by a masterstroke, leads the protagonist of this historically realistic human encounter with the phys | ical world, humanity and the conventional occidental world view, from the 'esclavage' ('slavery') of existential philosopher philosophies to the discovery of the absurd, the same soulfulness-to-person discover that Camus narrates in Le Mythe de Sisyphe" (307). "The Guest" is in consequence a commentary on all human existence, and Camus champions the existentialist viewpoint in it. In op prospect to nihilism and Marxism, he defies the idea that life is pointless or that criticism is valid. Instead, he holds up Daru and the guest as quintessential representatives of humanity. Like everyone on this planet, they do what they can and what they must in the midst of life situations that are perplexing and difficult to decide upon. Camus does not purpose that man always makes the right decision, but he does give notice that man does the best that he can within the consideration of his limited understanding and the nature of his circumstances. Camus grieves for the guest through the person of Daru, and he wants for him the freedom that has been offered to him, yet he cannot force the guest to accept that freedom. Likewise, we are often in a position to lead others to a helpful truth or situation, but they are the arbiters of | Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment