The philosophies of Adolf Hitler and Jean-Paul Sartre

He says that he has sensvas those who founded Marxism, and one of the reasons he opposes Marxism is because Marx was Jewish. He also opposes Marx's ideology, though ofttimes of what he says is clearly centered on Marx's Jewishness rather than on the ele manpowerts of Marxism as a philosophy, as can be seen when he writes:

If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the different hatfuls of the human beings, his top of the inning will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men (599).

Only a knowledge of the Jews provides the key with which to compreh stop the inner, and hence real, aims of Social Democracy (599).

Hitler takes an aristocratic sentiment of leadership, though it is non an aristocracy simply of birth. Hitler does not view the people as universe equal, and instead there is a pecking order, a social stratification from the lowest to the highest. This stratification is not based only on ability, with those with the greatest ability being the ones on top firearm those with lesser abilities fill out the lower tiers. This is a hierarchy with a racial and ethnic component as well, with current races being better than others, presumably because of centuries of breeding. Hitler in Mein Kampf showed hatred of Jews, communists, and other groups he saw as enemies of Germany, with the Aryan people of Germany being the r

ace destined to rule. Hitler c both(prenominal)ed for hefty leadership to enable Germany to resume her rightful gift, a place he saw as having been taken a guidance at the end of the First World War:

For me and all square(a) National Socialists there is precisely one doctrine: people and fatherland. . . Every thought and every idea, every doctrine and all knowledge, must serve this purpose (604).

When the nations on this planet excite for existence. . . then all considerations of humanitarianism or aesthetics decompose into nothingness. . . (613).

For Hitler, Marxism is wrong because it has a political ideology that views humanity as a mass and that is also opposed to his conception of personality.

His view of the state may sound similar in that he sees the state as a means to an end, but the end for Hitler is the aggrandizement of the leader and the glory of the fatherland.

Man is nothing else but what he pull outs of himself. Such is the first principle of existentialism. It is also what is called subjectivity, the attain we are labeled with when charges are brought against us. . . existentialism's first move is to make every man aware of what he is and to make the spacious responsibility of his existence rest on him (619).

The statist fascism of Hitler and the existentialism of Sartre both have influenced thought in this century for good and for ill, and they can be seen as opposing responses to the anxiety of the two world wars and their consequences. The racist theories of Hitler are still reflected in various conflicts in the modern world, and the demonization of other peoples remains a way in which states engender loyalty and stir up irritation against enemies. The existentialist position had a strong influence on the era after World War II in literature and philosophy, and yet as Sartre shows in his discussion, it has been attacked largely because it is seen as anti-religious even though it need not be that at all. These two philosophies represent particular statements of the tw
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!