Wars have been fought over many matters which whitethorn seem petty to some yet have enough importance to others that they would be willing to die for the nationalistic goals of their leadership. The validity of this statement may not be present in every fight but was certainly exercised in the First World War. in that respect are claims accusing factors such as the alliances, the many treaties betwixt each country, Germanys foreign policy of Weltpolitik and Russias concern to restore superciliousness within her borders as the causes of this massive conflict. These undoubtedly contributed to the upbringing of war, as the blackwash of Franz Ferdinand did. However due to the size of it, it can be easily said that it was a combination of both immense and short term causes that each country had within itself, its leaders and other territories that led to mass warfare, not solely the nimble causes.
        The alliances could be seen as an intricate net of secret and sanely public diplomatic relations that could (and would) cause a claw dispute between two belligerent states to escalate into a multi-national catastrophe. Even so Europe had been nigh to such a disaster years before, notably the Bosnian Crisis of 1909.
In this meter period war also seemed only a gun-shot away with some of the same countries that were to be at war atomic number 23 years later (Germany/Austria-Hungary and Russia/Serbia). Imanuel Geiss suggested that this could have been the first move in a programme leading to the eventual partition of Serbia itself. Which was (in the end) atomic number 53 of the effects the Great War had on Serbia.
        After the assassination it can be argued that the alliances did determine each countrys actions. Austria and Germany were allies so Germany would obviously back Austria in her war against Serbia...
If you want to determine a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment