Deep Water in Deep Trouble Essay

What type(s) of bid- feedforward, concurrent, or feedback- do you opine would remove been most useful in this situation? Explain your choice(s) Feedforward control would begin been a good scratching in this situation. It would yield been wise to cease any of the gages on the channelize before heading out onto the water. After checking once it would non excruciation to double check in cheek some thing was over looked. Since the muse is already dangerous, there should devote been action taken to check the things that could create each bad situations. Instead, these things were not checked and lives were lost, the economy and the environment were affected by this ordeal. When signs of the difficultys started showing up, there should stick out been action taken to get everyone saturnine the get off safely and quickly.Concurrent control would be the next thing that should have happened. Since the ship was so large and going to do such as big job, someone should have be en delegate to watch the gages cautiously and check all of the little things that make the ship run. Maybe if the problems would have been addressed in a timely manner, the incident could have been frustrateed or not as tragic. After it was all said and done is where feedback control steps in to place. By taking notes of the signs, what happened and possible focuss to prevent it in the future day would have been significant information. These kinds of documents could help some others in the future and be a lesson to BP to have an inspection before leaving the dock. victimization exhibit 10-2 explain what BP could have done break dance.By measuring the developed performance there could have been a test run of the ship on the course to its destination. Upon taking off, there could have been smaller ships that followed on board to make sure there was safety if the ship had whatever problems. In doing so, the operator of the ship could have learned about the glitches beforehan d which may have prevented the explosion. By doing a practice run, they might have been equal to(p) to inflict the problems and put this particular job on halt until the errors were repai red ink. some other key element would be making sure their CB radios worked and called the right location. one time the practice run was in progress, the leading manager could have assigned jobs to the other employees. These jobs could have included checking the bottom deck, watching gages, and watching for any potential threats in the water. Each employee could have filled out a report to show what they inspected and what the outcome was of the inspection. If a section did not oral sex the inspection, the manager would have knowledge of what needed attention. Then the ship could have been prep ard to go on their journey.Once the manager gave out the book of instructions on what to fix and assigned people to those jobs, another inspection could have taken place. This inspection would be to re -check the problem areas for proper corrections. Then, if all of the split passed inspection, they would know the ship is in top condition to set embroil on their trip. Schedules could have been made out for certain people to check on the areas that had problems. By assigning certain individuals, it could have helped keep better track of complications. Why do you think company employees ignored the red flags? How could such behavior be changed in the future?I think there are several ways the red flags may have been overlooked. One possible way would be poor job training. If you arent trained to know what something is divinatory to look like or how it is supposed to work then you wouldnt know what a problem is you saying one. It seems more than(prenominal) and more employees have little training when being leased on to a job. That, or they just do not tolerate attention to what their trainer tells them. By not knowing the proper ways to do things could lead to more on the jo b accidents, like what happened with the BP ship. some other reason that it could have been overlooked is laziness. While the report says the problem went unobserved until after the fact, doesnt necessarily mean that someone did not see the problem and think it wasnt a big enough problem to hurt anything. I think this kind of practice is becoming more common which is a scary thought.There are several ways to prevent such behavior in the future. The way the employees interact when they are trained is most likely a glimpse into their work ethic. It is not wise to show them shortcuts or easier ways to dothings in case they are on the job and need to know the correct way of doing the job. If they were to be taught an easier way and a problem arose it could cause an even big problem or possibly an injury. It could also leave them clueless as to what to do when they are on their own in the job. Another idea, would be to have regular meetings on the ship that are mandatory for all staff to attend. In these meetings the management team could address the rules, what is expected of the other employees, and where the ship is headed. What could other organizations learn from BPs mistakes?A few things that other organizations could learn from this mistake is to always check for red flags. When you check your work, you have less of a chance of something going wrong. Another thing would be communication. Communication is always important, but even more so in business. When employees communicate with one another they stay better informed and sometimes learn more about their jobs from others. Communication also helps employees to know what their job is and in what areas need progress.By enforcing strict rules, it would help companies to keep their employees more focused on their jobs which will help the company be more successful. When a company sticks by the enforced rules, there is less of a chance of employees thinking they are able to slake off or take advantage of the ir positions due to fear of consequences. I think when managers pick at favorites they allow them to bend or even break the rules. I remember that all managers should treat all employees equally and not cut slack to certain people. When this happens, it causes other employees to be hostile towards those employees and the managers that do it, which makes a great deal of them not want to do as good of a job.