The ICC was the natural logical step after the Nuremberg Trials. The ICCs ability is often compared unfavourably to the Nuremberg Trials, without taking into consideration the fact that the Nuremberg Trials were a victors trials. The Allied Powers had totally their accused in hold, had access to all the relevant documents, and had the military strength to bring the accused into custody if needed. The ICC, by comparison, is active in current war zones and cannot ravisher out justice retrospectively. It has no independent mechanism by which to bring accused persons into custody and has a much harder m of getting its hands on relevant documents. The ICC must be taken independently as an international body endeavoring to adjoin accountability deep down the international community.
The founding document of the ICC is the capital of Italy Statute, which is composed of three main principles (Arsanjani, 1999);
First, the principle of complementarity, which dictates that the court whitethorn assume jurisdiction only when national courts are unable or unwilling to exercise jurisdiction, with national courts taking precedence over the ICC.
Second, that the ICC is designed only to deal with the just about serious crimes which concern the international community. These include genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.
Third, that the ICC should remain within the realm of customary international law, in order to be widely accepted by the majority of States, to ensure a wide enough jurisdiction to be effective in curtailing serious violations of international human rights.
The ICC has many strengths deriving from the capital of Italy Statute. It provides an international mechanism to mete out justice for the most severe human rights...If you want to get a all-embracing essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment