Peter Novicks That Noble Dream: The Objectivity Question and the American Historical Profession is book of tendencies. Studying the works of umteen noteworthy historians is shown to expose a story about the tendencies of their thought. It is a work of historiography tracing the development of the American historical art, identifying the nonrecreational norms of their practice, and presenting a series of contestations about the professions objectives and concerns over the Objectivity Question. Novick asserts his work has no unifying thesis (17). While this and other(a) efforts at full disclosure are considerable, his stated tendency divulges his goal to do more than merely enlighten the reader. The books maneuver is to provoke my fellow historians to greater self-consciousness about the temperament of our work, Novick wrote of his motivation (17). It is obvious that Novick is going to try to convince historians that they should be more self-critical of their work and thought. Set in in this argument is the core notion that historians are not very thoroughly at reflecting on the philosophy of history, and it is in the interest of the profession to improve on this shortcoming.
According to Novick, objectivity is not a single idea, but a sprawling collection of assumptions, attitudes, aspirations, and antipathies (1). In other words, objectivity is a collection of conflictions. Inconsistently these conflicts provide deep enough to even contradict its conflicted nature. For instance, the basic components usually associated with historical objectivity are nailed down by Novick as a commitment to the reality of the past, and to truth as counterweight to that reality; a sharp separation between the knower and the known, between fact and value, and, above all, between history and apologue (1-2). Certainly a historian is holding ideals like...If you want to get to a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment