The Custer Battlefield National Monument

But history is invariably written by the winners and the vast majority of these accounts were prepared by sporty Americans. It seem equal a profound sarcasm that the clear winners of this particular; battle were so overwhelmingly the losers in the contend. Yet the irony is not so great for, as Hofling points out, the battle and Custer's actions there were events of minor importance. "That is to say, American history would presumptively not have turned out very otherwise if the whites had won the fight or if it had never happened." It is true that prevalent sentiment against the Indians was strengthened and the will to support the cruel war against the Indians was increased by public acquaintance of the battle. But the end to remove the Sioux and the Cheyenne from their lands had been do in Washington and nobody was really going to stop this campaign. Thus it is important to analyze to understand why this particular battle has remained a important event in American history -- both for white Americans and Native Americans. It should be noted that much of the interest in and controversy over the battle has nothing to do with the contest between European Americans and Native Americans. Custer's personality, even the Indians' possible perception of him as treac whizzus, are not important to this issue because he was merely a p

On the other hand, Custer has very much been denigrated as a symbol of the genocidal policies of the linked States. Utley has suggested that such a symbol would, more appropriately be someone who actually embodied the characteristics of the "bloodthirsty Indian slayer in blue, a rampaging and brutish agent of genocide, a date victim of his nation's sins." Utley is undoubtedly correct in assessing Custer as cosmos no better and no worse in his mental attitude toward the Indians that the average member of the U.S. Army or government. But Utley's estimate misses the point of Custer's importance as a symbol to Indians and others who intellection these episodes as reprehensible.

The Battle was an instance in which the Indians triumphed -- however before long -- over the policy of the United States as it was embodied in the people who had charged into their village intending to round them up like animals and put them in pens. The fact that Custer was a popular wiz was notable in so far as it made the event more noteworthy and, in current protests, it draws attending to the essential problems that persist even today. Custer might be set forth as 'just following orders' as the perpetrators of another genocidal program often claimed. This is, essentially, what Utley says in arguing that Custer is an inappropriate symbol of the repression of the Native Americans. He was, in fact, the best possible symbol for the Indian cause, previous(prenominal) and present. It really made very little difference to the deal of the Indians that it was Custer who was killed at the Little Big Horn. This fact had a significant impact on Americans' interest in the event however the genocide would have gone on regardless of who had been involved. Custer, however, had achieved a reputation at the expense of the Indians. The popular war hero turned to the destruction of the race as part of his continue pursuit of the glory and popularity that, he hoped, would raise him to political prominence. He may never have conscio
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!